Last updated: Dec 8, 2025. Written by Nick Babich.
This page highlights leading UX design agencies from key product and design hubs including New York, London, Berlin, Austin and San Francisco. Each team has a demonstrated record of shaping digital products across industries such as fintech, healthcare, ecommerce, SaaS and emerging AI tools.
Whether you are exploring partners for a new product or refining an existing one, this list helps you discover UX agencies that bring depth, reliability and user centered thinking to every stage of the design process. No agency paid to be here.
Selection process
As the Editor-in-Chief of UX Planet, and a UX practitioner with many years of experience in the industry, I approached the task of assembling this curated selection of the top 6 firms with the same rigor and depth I apply to all professional evaluations.
In compiling this international selection, I applied consistent criteria across diverse markets to identify firms that demonstrate truly universal excellence. Drawing on my worldwide UX expertise, I examined each agency’s ability to operate effectively in multicultural environments, reviewing portfolios that span continents – from AI-driven products in Europe to large-scale digital transformations in the United States. I cross-referenced client testimonials from global organizations to verify reputation and to ensure each agency’s adaptability to emerging challenges, including 2025’s cross-border data regulations and cultural nuances in interface design.
I assessed innovation by looking for solutions that address global issues, such as sustainable UX aligned with climate goals. I also evaluated communication practices and team dynamics to ensure each agency can collaborate seamlessly across time zones and distributed teams. Their processes were reviewed for efficiency at scale, and results were measured against international benchmarks such as regional user retention. Finally, I analyzed cost structures to understand the value provided across varying economies.
This holistic, borderless approach ensures that every agency recognized here is capable of delivering impactful, scalable UX strategies for businesses operating on a global stage.
I review every UX and UI design agency through a rigorous, research-driven process. Each firm featured on UXPlanet is selected not through automation or sponsorship, but through in-depth analysis of real work, verified results, and long-term client satisfaction.
I look for evidence of expertise, creativity, and reliability across the entire design lifecycle – from discovery to delivery. The agencies highlighted here consistently meet high standards in the following key areas:
Depth, clarity, and outcome-orientation of case studies and shipped work.
Scoring weight: 40%
Credibility of past engagements and the quality/verification of references.
Scoring weight: 30%
Right-sized, multidisciplinary team and a documented, accountable workflow.
Scoring weight: 20%
Alignment on domain, collaboration style, time zone, budget, and engagement model.
Scoring weight: 10%
The agencies featured below represent a cross-section of today’s most accomplished UX and UI design teams. Each has been selected for its ability to turn complex ideas into clear, intuitive digital experiences that drive measurable impact.
Best for: brand-centric digital experiences
Clients: Citrix, Turo, Mozilla
Strengths: branding/UI strength; high client satisfaction
Downside: some pace issues; high budgets ($50k+, $150–$199/hr)
Portfolio: ramotion.com/work
Services: UX and UI for web and mobile products, design systems, marketing websites, and brand identity for digital products.
Industries and product types: Strong fit for B2B SaaS, developer tools, fintech, security products, and fast growing tech startups that need a polished digital presence.
Feedback: "Ramotion went above and beyond, delivering high-quality work." - Bailey Jones
Business & Performance Metrics: +58% self-service score for Turo support portal
Score: 5 out of 5
Best for: UX design for AI and emerging technologies
Clients: Google, Amazon, Samsung
Strengths: focus on mobile/connected products; SF HQ; ~20+ yrs
Downside: engineering is “development support” vs full build
Portfolio: punchcut.com/work
Services: UX strategy, AI experience design, multimodal and voice interfaces, and prototyping for connected and intelligent products.
Industries and product types: Focus on consumer electronics, automotive and mobility, telecom, smart home, and AI driven services that span devices and contexts.
Feedback: "Punchcut excels in work-life balance, ensuring employees thrive personally" - past employee
Score: 5 out of 5
Best for: tech data-driven design solutions
Clients: HBO, Netflix, United Nations
Strengths: research-driven, flexible; 5.0 rating (39 reviews on Clutch)
Downside: occasional challenges recruiting niche users; some timelines extend on complex work
Portfolio: uxstudioteam.com/case-studies
Services: UX research and product design, including discovery, UX strategy, interaction design, UI design, and design systems.
Industries and product types: Works with B2B SaaS, consumer apps, fintech, media and streaming, and public or non profit digital services for web and mobile.
Feedback: "UX researchers were very proactive, responsive, and motivated." - Serge Zuev
Score: 4.9 out of 5
Best for: human-centered UX design blending physical and digital innovation
Clients: Samsung, Uber, Herman Miller
Strengths: award-winning industrial/brand design; founded by Yves Béhar; SF & Lisbon
Downside: portfolio skews to physical products/brand; digital-only UX is a subset
Portfolio: fuseproject.com/work
Services: industrial design, brand, and digital UX, covering hardware design, app and interface design, service design, and experience strategy.
Industries and product types: consumer tech, health and wellness, smart home and robotics, mobility, and lifestyle products where physical and digital touchpoints meet.
Feedback: "Great culture, great leadership" - past employee
Business & Performance Metrics: 95% of ElliQ users report feeling less lonely
Score: 4.8 out of 5
Best for: large-scale digital transformations
Clients: IKEA, Vistaprint, Gatorade
Strengths: small, senior teams; Forrester “model to follow”; marquee clients
Downside: requires intensive client participation/collaboration; geared to large brands.
Portfolio: work.co/clients
Services: Product strategy, UX and UI design, design systems, engineering, and ongoing optimisation for large scale digital platforms.
Industries and product types: Global brands in retail and e commerce, media and streaming, travel and transportation, financial services, and health.
Feedback: "We chose Work & Co because we knew they would create an end-to-end, beautiful, ownable retail ecosystem that also really performs." - Gregoire Baret
Business & Performance Metrics: 15% higher conversion within 60 days of launching of Aesop website
Score: 4.7 out of 5
Best for: innovation and design thinking for complex systemic challenges
Clients: IHG, Moderna, Sephora
Strengths: human-centered design pioneer; broad, multi-decade portfolio.
Downside: significant 2023 restructuring with office closures/layoffs; offerings skew to strategy & capability-building
Portfolio: ideo.com/work
Services: innovation and venture design, service and experience design, digital product UX, and organisational and capability building.
Industries and product types: Projects in healthcare, education, public sector, consumer products, mobility, and financial and social impact, often at system and service level.
Feedback: "IDEO’s thinking starts where other firms end." - Hardy Steinmann
Business & Performance Metrics: 107% traffic increase within four months of Sephora Shanghai store launch
Score: 4.5 out of 5
To support your review of the ux design companies, I’ve created this chart to visualize the key comparison criteria.
Choosing a UX agency affects product quality, speed to market, and how your team works day to day. The steps below help product leaders, founders, and marketing teams make a structured decision instead of relying on logos and awards alone.
Before you send the first brief, write down:
You can then judge agencies on whether they understand these outcomes and can connect their work to measurable impact.
When you read case studies, look for signals of real work rather than marketing copy:
If every case study looks the same and focuses only on visuals, it is harder to trust the depth of the UX work.
A solid UX process usually includes:
Ask the agency to walk through a recent project and show how this process worked in practice.
When proposals arrive, compare them against the same criteria:
If a proposal looks much cheaper, check whether research, iteration, or implementation support has been reduced.
A strong portfolio is not enough. Look for agencies that:
From here, build a shortlist of three to seven agencies that look aligned on industry, stage, and complexity.
The agency website may show impressive leadership, yet your project may be staffed differently. Ask:
You want a team that matches the complexity of your project, with enough senior support to make sound decisions.
Use calls to test fit instead of only collecting quotes. Helpful questions include:
The answers reveal how the agency thinks, how honest they are about trade offs, and how they handle complexity.
UX work depends on honest feedback and regular collaboration. During early conversations, notice:
You want a partner who is transparent, structured, and easy to work with, especially when deadlines are tight.
Pricing varies by region, agency profile, and project scope. This section explains common pricing models and typical ranges so you can plan a realistic budget.
You pay for the hours a team spends on your project, often with a weekly or monthly cap.
You pay a monthly fee for access to a product team that can handle research, design, and ongoing improvements.
The agency provides a flat fee for a defined scope that includes phases, activities, and deliverables.
The price is tied to expected impact, such as uplift in conversion, revenue, or savings.
Many agencies mix models. For example, a fixed price discovery phase followed by time and materials or a retainer for delivery and optimisation.
These ranges are indicative. Real numbers depend on team size, research depth, and how much of the product surface you want to touch. Use these ranges to check whether proposals look reasonable for your scope and region.
The numbers below are broad ranges that can shift with market conditions and seniority levels, yet they help with early planning.
Roughly 120 to 250 USD per hour for established agencies. Boutique or highly specialised teams can be higher.
Roughly 90 to 200 USD per hour.
Roughly 50 to 140 USD per hour.
Roughly 40 to 120 USD per hour.
Wide range, often 40 to 150 USD per hour depending on country, agency profile, and team seniority.
When you compare rates, also compare:
A slightly higher rate can be more efficient if the team is smaller, more experienced, and better integrated with your product process.
Quick comparisons among the UX design agencies
Got questions? We've got answers.
Not seeing the perfect fit? Check our related guides below:
Contact us
If you have any questions please feel free to contact us.
The form has been successfully submitted.