My picks for wallets, DeFi apps, exchanges and NFT platforms that newcomers can use without fear and traders can use at speed
Last updated: October 31, 2026. Written by Nick Babich.
A good Web3 UX agency can show you a wallet, exchange, or onchain app it designed and explain how it handled the moments where crypto users quit: creating a wallet, approving a signature, paying a network fee, and sending funds that cannot be pulled back. Those moments decide adoption more than any visual style. A blockchain transaction has no chargeback and no support line that can reverse it, so every confirmation screen carries the weight that a bank's fraud team carries elsewhere.
I wrote this list for founders of crypto startups, product leads at exchanges and wallet companies, and teams at protocols that need their first real interface. Each studio below gets one linked crypto case, the products it fits, and the questions I would ask before signing. Most of them also take fintech work, but I ranked them only on what they have shipped for wallets, DeFi, trading, and NFTs.
Editorial note: No agency paid for placement. Lazarev.agency is first because its Dollet Wallet case pairs research with 1,600 participants with a redesign aimed at both newcomers and professional traders. Pricing comes from Clutch or the studio's own site and changes often, so confirm current terms with each studio.
I ranked studios on crypto products they can name, then on how they handle the problems only blockchain products have: keys, signatures, gas, irreversible transfers, and screens full of live market data. Every agency needed at least one public case on a wallet, exchange, DeFi app, NFT platform, or other onchain product, with a description of the design work itself rather than a logo or a landing page. I then scored each studio against the criteria below.
I looked for cases that name the product and report something a buyer can check, such as wallets created, monthly users, app store rating, sales, or brand sign-ups. A token landing page or a Dribbble concept did not count.
Seed phrases are where most newcomers give up. I gave credit to studios that design separate paths for creating, importing, and connecting a wallet, and that explain recovery in plain words. Ethereum's guide to account abstraction describes how smart contract wallets allow recovery from lost keys and remove the need to hold ETH for fees, and I favored teams that have designed for that model.
A user who approves a transaction they do not understand can lose funds for good. The EIP-712 standard for typed structured data lets wallets show what a signature request contains instead of an unreadable string, and good UX teams put that content in human terms. I checked whether cases show review screens, fee previews in local currency, and pending-state feedback.
Users should not need to know what gwei is. I looked for designs that show the network fee as a clear amount before confirmation, hide chain switching where possible, and explain bridges and cross-chain swaps step by step.
Exchanges and trading terminals show order books, charts, positions, and profit and loss at once. Traders judge a venue in seconds, so I credited studios with dashboards and order flows designed to be read quickly on desktop and phone.
Most crypto products serve someone buying a first token and someone running a strategy across several chains. I favored cases that use progressive disclosure, so the basics come first and advanced tools sit one level deeper.
Custodial exchanges and fiat on-ramps carry identity checks, and in the EU the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) sets uniform market rules for crypto-assets not covered by existing financial law. I looked for studios that design verification, warnings, and risk disclosures as part of the flow rather than a wall of legal text.
Protocols ship new features every few weeks. A tokenized component library keeps a wallet or exchange consistent as it grows, so I gave weight to cases that hand over a working design system.
Some studios run short sprints, others run monthly partnerships or full product builds. For each I recorded how it engages and checked the minimum budget and hourly range on Clutch or its own pricing page; those figures drive the price graph further down.
One linked crypto case per studio, so you can study the actual wallet, exchange, or dApp before booking a call.
Best for (Web3): wallet and NFT products that must win first-time users without losing professional traders
Lazarev.agency's Dollet Wallet case study covers a Web3 finance app for storing, tracking, and managing digital assets. The team ran global UX research with 1,600 participants across three groups: crypto newcomers, beginners, and professionals. Research showed that unclear terminology and hidden core features caused drop-offs in the first week, so the redesign added plain-language onboarding, visual balance tracking, and contextual tips. Transfer flows now use simple wording and persistent transaction widgets that show pending transfers in real time, and a Portfolio section consolidates several wallets and networks. The studio's Metastaq NFT case on the same site reports 200+ brand sign-ups.
Why I would shortlist Lazarev.agency
Research at that scale is rare in crypto design, and it led to concrete fixes for the exact places users were scared: jargon, hidden features, and transfers with no feedback.
Best fit
Verify before hiring
Score: 4.9
Best for (Web3): funded crypto startups building trading apps, perps venues, prediction markets, or self-custody wallets
Halaska's Ulys case study covers a crypto investing app built from scratch for iOS and Android. Over twelve months the studio worked with the founders, head of product, and engineers on the core UX architecture and on flows for onboarding, trading, portfolio management, and non-custodial wallet setup, in light and dark mode. The design goal was to remove gas fees, seed phrase anxiety, and chain switching from the user's view. The app launched on the App Store, and the studio lists a $7.7M Series A for the client. Halaska says crypto, DeFi and trading is the segment it started in and still where most of its product work comes from.
Why I would shortlist Halaska
It prototypes core flows in code and tests them with real traders before the build is funded, which suits teams that need to show investors a working product.
Best fit
Verify before hiring
Score: 4.8
Best for (Web3): retail crypto exchanges that need brand and trading UX rebuilt together for mainstream buyers
Year One's Suncrypto case study covers a 16-week rebrand and UX/UI rebuild for an exchange serving first-time traders. The team rebuilt the buy, sell, chart, and confirm flows around progressive disclosure: new users see the amount, the price, and one clear action, while order books, live charts, and market stats appear when someone needs them. Branding and product ran as one track. The case reports 2.5 million monthly users, a 4.4-star rating, monthly active users growing from 300,000 to 900,000 after launch, and average transaction-flow time falling from 25 to 14 seconds.
Why I would shortlist Year One
It publishes the clearest product metrics on this page, and its trading-flow time is the kind of number an exchange can verify in its own analytics.
Best fit
Verify before hiring
Score: 4.7
Best for (Web3): exchanges with several product teams that need one design system and visual language
Turtle's Binance.US case study covers a new visual language and design system for the US exchange. The team audited the existing system to map governance gaps, fragmented components, and inconsistent use across product surfaces, then interviewed product and engineering leads. The result is a fully tokenized Figma library wired to engineering tokens, with type chosen to hold up on dense trading screens as well as marketing pages. To test the system, Turtle designed new product features with the exchange's DeFi team. Binance.US's head of design is quoted on the page.
Why I would shortlist Turtle
Large exchanges break when every team draws its own buttons. Turtle treated governance as a design problem and proved the system on live features rather than in documentation alone.
Best fit
Verify before hiring
Score: 4.6
Best for (Web3): trading terminals, launchpads, and yield products that need many screens designed fast
Merge's TokenPlace case study covers a terminal for trading across several crypto exchanges in one window, with automated order-splitting. The team designed more than 800 screens for web and mobile, including portfolio management, sync of multiple exchange accounts, deposits, withdrawals, transfers, a dashboard with trading volumes and token prices, and a short illustrated onboarding. Other crypto work on its site includes the vVv launchpad, with user roles, a modular design system, and an admin panel for creating investment rounds and distributing project tokens, and the Block Earner yield app.
Why I would shortlist Merge
It has done the unglamorous parts of crypto products, such as admin panels and account syncing, and its Clutch hourly band of $25 to $49 keeps large screen counts affordable.
Best fit
Verify before hiring
Score: 4.5
Best for (Web3): crypto trading platforms with sign-ups that never turn into a first trade
UX studio's Zignaly case study covers a two-month project for a crypto trading platform where users copy other traders or follow trade suggestions. A designer and a researcher interviewed people who had signed up but never invested, tested the existing platform with first-time users, and mapped the journey to find the main pain points: low activation and the effort of managing several exchange accounts. The redesigned web app was tested and refined every week. The case lists 20 usability tests, more than 80 research insights, and 56 final screens, plus a UI kit, mobile version, and dark mode.
Why I would shortlist UX studio
Activation is the hardest problem in crypto trading products, and this team started with the users who dropped out rather than the ones who stayed.
Best fit
Verify before hiring
Score: 4.5
Best for (Web3): DeFi wallets that bundle token sales, NFTs, and dApp access into one mobile app
Arounda's Infinity wallet case study covers a five-month UI/UX overhaul for a multi-currency DeFi wallet from a UK client. The team built a full mobile app from pre-designed frameworks and made it consistent with the existing web platform. Features include token sales, purchases and transactions, an NFT store and management, dApps, WalletConnect integration, and QR codes, with simpler onboarding for beginners and less visual clutter. Arounda also produced illustrations and a style guide covering every visual element of the platform.
Why I would shortlist Arounda
WalletConnect and dApp access are where many wallets feel bolted together. Arounda designed them inside one consistent system, and its Clutch hourly band of $25 to $49 suits a startup budget.
Best fit
Verify before hiring
Score: 4.5
Best for (Web3): smart wallets and DeFi apps that want onboarding without seed phrases
Sollas's Unhosted case study covers a self-custody smart wallet designed from zero, combining swaps, perps trading, account-abstraction modules, and a Visa card in one app. The design uses account abstraction to replace the seed phrase with sign-in through Apple or Google and lets users pay gas in any token. Networks are shown visually instead of as a list of names, with sensible defaults that users can change later. The case reports more than 100,000 wallets generated through the onboarding Sollas designed, one localized interface used in 20+ countries, and 100+ chains in a single feed.
Why I would shortlist Sollas
Account abstraction only helps if the interface hides the machinery. Sollas shows how that looks in a shipped wallet, and its two-week sprint format is an easy way to test the fit.
Best fit
Verify before hiring
Score: 4.4
Best for (Web3): SaaS platforms that use tokens and NFTs as rewards and need clear analytics
Eleken's Glow Labs case study covers a white-label Web3 loyalty rewards platform moving from an iFrame widget to a full SaaS product. One designer worked for six months with the product manager, founder, and developers, and usability testing with the client's customers shaped the design, including bigger, brighter buttons. The platform lets companies use ERC-20 tokens and NFTs as rewards, with a custom gradient option for NFT cards and a simple analytics dashboard showing a community score. Deliverables were the MVP design, the SaaS platform design, and a responsive UI kit. Eleken states that Glow Labs was its first blockchain client.
Why I would shortlist Eleken
Many Web3 businesses are really B2B SaaS with tokens inside. Eleken's strength is analytics and dashboards, and its Clutch hourly band of $25 to $49 fits long engagements.
Best fit
Verify before hiring
Score: 4.3
The chart scores all nine studios on five Web3 criteria and an overall score, each out of 10. Lazarev.agency leads overall and on wallet onboarding, backed by its 1,600-participant Dollet research. Year One leads on shipped crypto proof, Halaska on trading and data-dense screens, Sollas on transaction clarity and fees, and Turtle on design systems and trust cues.
Pick the studio whose crypto work matches your custody model and your user, not just your chain. A custodial exchange lives with identity checks, deposits, and order books, while a self-custody wallet lives with keys, signatures, and recovery, and few studios are equally strong at both.
Write down whether your product is custodial, self-custody, or a smart wallet, and ask each finalist which of the three they have shipped. The answer changes onboarding, recovery, and support more than any visual decision.
Ask finalists how they test sending funds, approving tokens, and recovering a wallet with people who have never done it, using testnets or prototypes rather than real money. A studio that only shows polished screens has not proven the flows that cost users the most.
Set the measures before design starts, such as wallets created, first deposits, first trades, failed or abandoned transactions, and support tickets about lost funds, and agree on who tracks them.
A strong Web3 proposal names the custody model, the riskiest flows, and how each will be tested before launch. If you are collecting bids from several studios, my guide to writing a UX design RFP helps you get answers you can compare.
Each kind of crypto product fails in its own place, so I match the studio to the product type first. A wallet fails at recovery and signing, while an exchange fails when traders cannot read the order book fast enough. For every product type, the image lists the UX focus that matters most, one question to answer before you sign, and the studios from this list I would call first.
Web3 UX projects with the studios on this page start around $10,000 for a focused first engagement and reach $100,000 or more at the top of the range. The figures come from each studio's Clutch profile or its own pricing page, so treat them as planning floors rather than quotes.
Hourly bands also vary: Merge, Arounda, and Eleken show $25 to $49 on Clutch, UX studio shows $50 to $99, and Lazarev.agency shows $100 to $149. Budgets rise with every extra chain, custody option, and compliance requirement, so price the riskiest flows first.
A Web3 UX project moves from discovery to launch like any product, with extra steps for custody, signing, chains, and security review. The general stages are in my walkthrough of the UX design process; the list below adds the crypto-specific work.
The four logo graphs below show how each studio works, not how it ranks, and each axis is scored from 0 to 10. On marketing-driven vs product-focused, studios toward the left also do a lot of brand, website, and launch work, while those toward the right work mainly inside wallets and trading products. Ideation vs execution separates research and concept work from teams that deliver large screen counts and front-end code. Usability vs aesthetics shows whether a studio leads with research and task success or with visual identity, and low vs high price places each studio by its published minimums and rates, with my own judgment where figures are missing.
Be careful with any studio whose crypto portfolio is only token landing pages and NFT art, with no wallet, trade, or transaction flow it designed. The Web3-specific warning signs are below, and my guide to UX agency red flags covers the general ones.
Key Takeaways
Got questions? We've got answers.
Contact us
If you have any questions or you want your agency to be considered for listing with us, please feel free to contact us.
The form has been successfully submitted.
